How Will Google Ad Manager Migration to 1st Price Auctions Affect The Market? Focus on buyers.
(Part 1 of a 4 part series on Best Practices for First Price Auctions) - Go to Part 2
By the end of the 2019 Google will run a unique first-price auction at the GAM level. In other terms, instead of being reduced to the second highest bidder (or the floor), buyers will start paying the exact amount they have bid to win the auction.
All ad-tech players are wondering what the consequences of this move will be. So we decided to publish a blog series of four articles that will explore this Google move: market effects and some best practices for publishers.
In this first article, we will see what the market effects on buyers will be and specifically:
1) How buyers adapt to manage their margin
2) How bid shading works
How Buyers Adapt to Manage Their Margin
When the market moves from 2nd to 1st price, Buyers have to adapt to manage their margin.
In a second price auction, Buyers can bid their true value for each auction. They will only pay the price of the second bidder or the floor. This is what we call the bid reduction process. And this is what creates the margin for a Buyer:
If the true value of the buyer is $5…
and there is no other buyer competing in the auction (this still happens a lot!)...
And the floor is $3
Then the buyer will pay *3.01… and make a $1.99 margin
→ the margin of the buyer directly depends on the floor and / or competition within the auction
In a first price auction, buyers cannot bid their true value. If they do so, they will end up paying their true value… and make no margin. In our example, if the buyer bids $5… he will pay $5… and won’t make any money.
So buyers have to bid below their true value to make a margin. But this is a difficult exercise:
the more a buyer decreases its bid value the better its margin…
but the more likely it is to lose the auction because of floors and / or competition (and not make any money… again)
Buyers have to be smart when decreasing their bid, finding the sweet spot between hitting the right margin value (bid low enough) and impression volume (bid high enough). The process of reducing its bid value is what we call “Bid Shading”.
→ the margin of the buyer directly depends on its ability to predict the floor price of the Publisher and (where there is…) the bids of competitors in the same auction.
How does Bid shading work?
Bid shading actually consists of 2 steps:
Predicting the value of the Publisher floor price and competitor bids: to increase their margin, buyers have to bid as low as possible… and just on top of the floor (or the highest competitor bid). This can be based on an “exploration” logic to detect how changing the value of a bid affects its win rate.
Allocating bids across all impressions opportunities, so that the overall margin is as high as possible for a volume of impressions in line with the buyer goals. Basically it means targeting 1st the auctions with high true value and low floor price / competition, then moving to auctions where floors and competition are a bit higher and so on. The idea is to maintain a high win rate while spending as little as possible.
Funny thing: if bid shading was perfect… buyers would be able to predict exactly the value of the floor and competitive bids… and bid just 1 cent above. The final CPM would then be the same as in 2nd price auction.
Having said that, nobody's perfect, nor is bid shading. So the final CPM will usually be higher than the “2nd price” CPM.
In a first-price auction, buyers will no longer have an incentive to bid their “true value” of the impression (and risk paying too much and reducing their margins)...
They are now willing to find the bid that will make them win the auction, without paying too much
Predicting how much a buyer should reduce its perceived value of an impression to make sure he’s still winning it at the cheapest price is called “bid-shading”
Note that the largest DSPs (AdWords, DV360, Criteo, TradeDesk) in the industry have already developed their own bid-shading algorithm, and are using it in first-price auctions (run by SSPs like AppNexus, Rubicon, …).
On the left, an example of a very efficient bid-shading algorithm, leading to two conclusions:
- First-price auction offers bid-shading algorithms the opportunity to minimize their bid (and spend) while maintaining their win rate...
Putting publishers at risk, especially in auctions where competition is low.
- The first-price auction model encourages buyers to seek the lowest bid possible to win an auction.
Most large DSPs have already developed (and are already using) bid-shading algorithms.
Is that good for Publishers then?
Find it out in the next article:
Google Move to First Price Auction: Market Effects and Best Practices - Next >